From the Ground Up: Milieu Shaping Myths

The need for a set of mythology is part of the human condition.  Much about our world frightens us or makes us feel very, very small and insignificant.  You can see this tendency when we look at a mother comforting her children, who are often the most honest with their fears.  Thunder and lightening?  That isn’t frightening little one.  It’s just Thor using Mjölnir to protect us from the Ice Giants.  Something mysterious and frightening is now an ally, a protector.  If only I can blame Loki for all the socks that go missing in the wash.  As always, I ask the question: as writers, how can we use mythology to make our works better?  Let’s take a simple origin story for a city-state and work through the implications together, shall we?

 

“The city of Jesquat has not always been the mightiest principality of the Tabbet Empire.  No, young ones, before the bustling market squares and efficient ports, noble halls of learning and mighty walls came to be, the land we now stand upon was wild and untamed.  Barbarians roamed our lands and though the thousand eyes of the One God gazed down each night, though there was no one to worship.

Then, there came the First peoples.  They were mighty and experienced seamen, long from home and succor, brave and strong.  When the demons of storm and sea sought to destroy them, they fought back valiantly, but inevitably, few survived and their vessel was lost.  For three nights, the One God’s thousand eyes watched the Firsts as many of their number struggled to hold off the final dawn.  By the third day, the former crew had fractured, deprived of unity and direction as the dawn claimed their captain.  Lacking the tools and skills to repair the wreckage of their craft, plagued with memories and longing for home, many risked the trek through the wild frontier.  Of those that remained, only three names have survived to be whispered today.

Bae’ren lead.  Captain’s seneschal and daughter of the Primaka of her homeland, she had been trained from birth to be a leader to her people.  Though she had the authority and right to demand the service of departed-lost, she let them to their wanderings.  Bae’ren knew that those who left the sea were doomed to death and despair, but she was wise and benevolent and with heavy conscience let the departed-lost chart their own trek.  Bae’ren became the first Primaka of our people.

Aben’rah made.  Ship’s carpenter and quartermaster, his hands were nearly as clever as his tongue.  Through hard work and ingenuity, he made a life for the Firsts in the wild and unforgiving land.  Aben’rah knew that if the Firsts were to survive, it would be by their sweat and blood, so with dedication and fervor he taught his crafts.  Aben’rah became the first Lord Builder of our people.

Oman’tak defended.  Ship’s guardian and first spear, he fought for the Firsts in the name of the One God.  Though injured in the destruction of his charge, the sharpness of his will and the trueness spirit remained, and he safeguarded the Firsts from dangers of the wild and wildmen.  He knew that his spear alone was insufficient to maintain the lives of the Firsts, so he trained any who would learn.  He became the first Guardian-General of our people.

And so, under the guidance and succor of the First Three, our people thrived and grew, built and prospered, were safe guarded and established an empire.”

 

So, let’s start thinking aloud.  I like to start with history and politics as it allows me to put up the skeleton of the culture.  In this case, I would say that the people of Jesquat likely claim origins from a group of seafarers who were stranded where the city stands.  As myth, especially origin myth, usually only resembles history, it is unlikely that the series of events were exactly as plotted in the story.  For example, it is unlikely that the actual names have remained intact over the centuries since the founding of Jesquat.  Instead, I’d establish that Jesquat is ruled by a triumvirate, the Primaka, the Lord Builder and the Guardian-General, with prestige in that order.  Together, they would be called the “First Three,” like they were in the legend.  The myth also mentions that Jesquat is a principality in an empire, that it was the first town in the area and that the empire expanded from Jesquat.  This would mean that Primaka would be effectively equivalent to a renaissance Italian prince, so I could draw inspiration from those courts in regard to future world building.  Also, the Primaka is woman in the legend, so is this position traditionally female?  Likewise, are the Lord Builder and Guardian-General both traditionally masculine roles?

Next, I like to look to religion.  The myth mentions a “One God” whose eyes are the stars.  If the people of Jesquat maintained a sea faring lifestyle, then this would make sense as navigation could be easiest at night.  I could then tie in religious significance to economics and travel.  There is already established significance tying death to the dawn, so is birth tied to dusk?  What is the mythological significance to daylight?  Topics I will have to examine in greater detail.  The “Firsts” are held in high regard according to the myth, so is there some aspect of ancestor worship amongst the Jesquati?  If so, do spirits of significant people become one of the stars?  Does the religion have a centralized leadership or is it family by family?

Now, looking at economics and immigration, as the myth’s introduction mentions “bustling market squares and efficient ports,” and Jesquat is mentioned to be a principality, so I would make Jesquat to be a trade city.  Local food would be grown outside the walls by small farming communities and then traded at market for necessities they cannot make.  Jesquat is a walled city according to the myth, so either there is no expansion beyond the walls, in which case, immigration is relatively low and real-estate is at a premium, or there has been expansion beyond the walls and the upper class and very wealthy live inside the walls.  I personally favor the second as it allows for more cultural variation within the city itself which will make it easier to make the milieu rounder.

Finally, I would mine this myth for linguistic and other miscellaneous cultural trends.  When I structured the myth, I was imagining a grandfather passing down the knowledge to a brood of grandchildren.  It made sense, then, for the myth to take the structure of an oral tradition with the repetition of paired descriptors and the structuring of paragraphs three, four and five from a common template.  For a trade city to be successful on an empire-scale, there must be some form of written language or accounting, but universal literacy isn’t necessarily a requirement.  So then, are performance arts such as public theater or professional bards a form of cultural entertainment and dissemination of knowledge?  How common are books, and what are the literacy rates amongst different levels of the populace?

Also, I’d take a look at the names in the myth.  All three names are compound names.  This could be a cultural trend, but I like the idea of using suffixes to distinguish prestige, so common names would be one or two syllables with no suffix.  The Primaka would take the suffix “ren, the Lord Builder “rah and the Guardian-General “tak.  I could then structure hierarchies of suffixes that are subordinate to “ren, “rah and “tak but linguistically similar amongst their own population.  I would then have to create additional hierarchies as honorifics amongst the various social classes (such as merchants or within families).  Also, the masculine names mentioned in the myth have a vowel-consonant-vowel-consonant pairing structure, allowing me to develop a grouping of “traditional” Jesquati names.  The feminine names would likely start with consonants but have fewer restrictions than the masculine names based on the sample from the myth.

The origin myth I developed for Jesquat resulted in more questions than answers, but it gave me places to start asking those questions in the development of my milieu.  By creating several other myths or histories that tie into the origin myth of the Firsts, I would be able to start pinning down more and more details from which the milieu could be built.  I do not start all milieus this way, but it is often an entertaining way to begin and has helped me overcome writer’s block.  Turning back myth and legend is a way to begin, whether it be by the tales of a culture long gone and remembered mostly for their mythology, or a mythology created by an author to enhance milieu.

Greek Myths and Legends

When we decide to make Myths and Legends the month’s topic, I wanted to write about tWEB_N Greene-1he Greek myths and legends. Why? Because these stories are part of my cultural backbone. I even had to study them in high school.

Man has a powerful need to explain the unexplainable. We attribute human qualities to things that aren’t us. We do it often enough that the tendency has its own name – anthropomorphism. Ancient Greeks and Romans tried to control and understand the world around them by making natural phenomenon, and complex concepts like justice, medicine and war, into people. Well, more than people. Gods who were as flawed and petty as their hapless worshipers. The world around them was big and scary. Attributing the whims of the weather, or the path of your life to superior beings made the world understandable and brought some comfort. After all, if the Fates or the Furies were rearranging the thread of your life, how much were you really to blame for the bad things that happened? Even Hercules was the Furies’ play thing.

Our world was forever changed by these myths. Writers still look for our Muses.

Retellings – putting a new spin on a classic- are popular in just about every genre right now, especially the YA and fantasy markets. I think part of the reason is that we are still asking the same questions, and for lots of the same reason. Millionaires played fast and loose with other people’s money and destroyed their financial well-being. Companies traded paper as if it was gold, and the world economy shuttered and nearly collapsed when people stopped believing that paper had value. Seems a bit like the Fates and Furies messing with us. Natural disasters abound.

In one of my Greek Myth retellings, Apollo asks, “You call them earthquakes, tsunamis, and tornados. I call them Titans. Does it really matter? The point is the world’s in upheaval.”

Does it really matter?apollorising-final galley

Probably not.

So, why the love affair with Greek myths?

They are part of who we are. They show us where we came from and, maybe, where we’re going.

As writers, the Greek myths give us inspiration. By referring to them, we build resonance. By rewriting them, we remake the world we live in. Myths and legends let us tell stories about people and events that are greater than we are. They allow us to explore the world in a way we couldn’t otherwise. We can explore real problems with the veneer of that other place, another time. It’s safe to question how the world works in a myth. And it’s entirely human.

 

Werewolves and Vampires – Classic Monsters of Myth and Legend

Werewolves and Vampires.  Two favorite monsters that have scared and fascinated the world for centuries.

First:  Vampires – we have poems, stories, and plays dating back to the 1700’s, based on legends that date back even further. (one list claims there have been 197 vampire movies)

Vampire imageSome well-known stories and/or movies:

  • Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897)
  • Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997 – 2003)
  • Jim Butcher’s Dresden Files (2000 – 2011)
  • Interview with a Vampire (1994)
  • the Blade series (1998 – 2004)
  • The Lost Boys (1987)
  • Salem’s Lot by Stephen King (book:  1975, Movie:  1979)

Why so much focus on vampires, and why do they continue to appeal to generation after generation?

Anciently, vampires were always seen as creatures of gothic horror, little more than animated corpses often preying on their closest loved ones.  Then, starting as early as the 1800’s, vampires became sensual, seductive creatures, the living embodiment of forbidden lusts.  The classic Dracula by Bram Stoker is a great example of that transition period that dramatically impacted the entire field.

Later Vampire stories continued to evolve, many focusing on vampire hunters (Blade, Buffy, Monster Hunter International), and eventually portraying vampires less as evil incarnate and more  as objects of desire (Twilight).

I find the transition interesting.  It’s rare these days to find a classic vampire that just sneaks around at night looking for virgins to bite.  Far more often, the vampires are depicted as cool, rich, sexy, and desirable, with a hint of danger thrown in that only seems to increase the appeal.  People today seem to want to flirt with the danger rather than destroy it.

Then there are the Werewolves (or lycanthropes)

Werewolf imageWerewolf legends are some of the oldest and most widespread of all monsters, with stories from all parts of the world.  Werewolves are shape shifters, the living embodiment of the beast caged inside of man, released to savage across the world without restraint.

Early werewolves were often depicted as witches, who used various potions to turn into wolves, or required intricate rituals to affect the change.  The full moon, connected with madness in people for millennia, is generally associated with werewolves too.  Some werewolves can voluntarily change shape, others are cursed, usually after being bitten, and face a terrible fate of changing against their will and losing control.

Werewolves in the past century have generally been depicted as being vulnerable to silver, but highly resistant to other injuries.  Stories about werewolves abound, all the way back to Little Red Riding Hood.

Many movies have been made about werewolves, including notables like:

  • Werewolf of London (1935)
  • The Wolf Man (1941)
  • The Howling (1981)
  • Silver Bullet (1985) – based on a novella by Stephen King
  • Dog Soldiers (2002)

Unlike vampires, far fewer werewolf stories depict them as anything but horrific creatures.  We love to be scared, to see the face of destructive evil.

Werewolves vs Vampires imageThen there is the awesome juncture where vampires and werewolves meet:

  • The Underworld series (starting in 2003)
  • The Twilight series
  • Larry Correia’s Monster Hunter International Series
  • Van Helsing (2004) – one of my favorites
  • Even Abbot and Costello

So what continues to drive the fascination?  I remember years ago people saying, “Don’t write any more vampire stories.  That market is saturated and dead.”

Then Twilight took over the world, and spawned an entire new genre of paranormal romance.  Vampires and werewolves are still everywhere.

I think part of the allure is the fact that people know these monsters.  Sure, different stories twist facts around some but, for the most part when someone says “vampire” or “werewolf”, people immediately get a sense of what they’re talking about.

For vampires, they’re always tied to seductive evil, and audiences get a thrill flirting along that forbidden line.

Werewolves, savage and hard to kill, offer great power, and the loss of all restraint, all social norms.  They’re the animal we all hold within, the face of what happens when we cross the line and step to the far side of chaos.

Although I have no interest in writing a vampire or werewolf story any time soon, there are lessons to be learned by the great ongoing success of these stories, and the myths that give them life.  Are the monsters in our stories sensual, tempting, and savage?  Do they terrify and fascinate in equal measure?  Do they reflect the darkness lurking within the characters, and by extension, the readers?  Is there a risk the hero may fall to that darkness, even in their moment of victory?

If so, your own myths might prove to be legends in their own right.

The Inevitability of Myth

Guest Post by Gregory D. Little

Greg Little

 

The human brain craves stories at a fundamental level.  In fact, it’s the world’s most prolific writer, constantly stringing together chains of perceived events in ways that both flatter and preserve itself.  I’m not just saying that because I find it a flattering thought as a writer (though the irony is not lost on me).  Science supports the claim.  Modern psychology and neuroscience have uncovered hosts of mental biases and fallacies humans engage in constantly.  David McRaney’s amateur psychology blog (and book) You Are Not So Smart explores such topics as Confirmation Bias (where you selectively and subconsciously only notice evidence that corroborates your existing world view while ignoring all evidence to the contrary) in entertaining detail.  In Cordelia Fine’s wonderful book A Mind of Its Own, Fine demonstrates how the human brain constantly rewrites our perception of reality in order to construct only the most flattering of self-images.  And if you are thinking to yourself “Well, other people might do that, but I don’t,” then I hate to tell you, but you are doing it right now.

I realize this may seem to have little to do with a blog about writing and myths, but bear with me, I’ll get there.   Most of these mental fallacies and biases are heuristics, or short-cuts we use to cut corners with our mental processing.  The brain uses a lot of energy.  Over the generations it has developed these short-cuts as a way to save precious calories for better use elsewhere, like running away from that tiger that has been eyeing you.  In days past, it didn’t matter if you understood the complex nuances of a situation perfectly if taking the time and energy to do so got you eaten.  Most of the time an 80% solution was enough.

That leads directly into the second reason the human mind loves stories, that of self-preservation.  The brain is constantly looking for meaning and agency in things it observes.  The reason is simple.  Using our tiger example again, if the bushes behind you suddenly rustle, most of the time it’s just the wind.  A random event, not terribly interesting.  But on the off chance it’s your tiger friend preparing an ambush, maybe you’d better run just in case.  Our most successful ancestors found meaning in things that lacked meaning (another way to put this might be finding narrative where none exists) because doing so was a lot less dangerous than not finding narrative and attributing the rustling to random wind.  Because when you’re wrong on something like that, you don’t get another chance to be right.

So the human brain craves stories both for its own flattery and to keep itself alive.  Is it any wonder we love to lose ourselves in a good narrative, particularly one in which we know we aren’t going to be eaten by the tiger?  But how does this relate to myth?  In my view, myths are the combination of these two basic elements in their purest form.  Myths are the stories, the narratives we invented to explain the world around us while we still lacked the scientific framework we make use of today.  Myths are also the legends we passed down through the generations that show humanity at its best.  Myths feature noble heroes fighting wicked monsters, bad people getting their just desserts and children who fail to listen to their parents getting eaten by the wicked witch.  Has there ever been a purer metaphor for the existential terror every parent feels for the safety of their child than some of those old cautionary tales?

The world is never as simple as myth depicts it.  Real heroes are always flawed and always disappoint us when those flaws become public.  Sometimes bad people don’t get punished and good people do.  Earth is not sitting on the back of a giant turtle.  Life is complicated, but we crave simplicity.  We want black and white answers to moral dilemmas.  We yearn for incorruptible heroes and villains as easy to discern as Lord Voldemort.  We demand a universe that conforms to our very limited capacity for metaphor and common sense.  Myths show us the world as we wish it was.  For these reasons and more, the creation of myths was and will continue to be inevitable.  As writers, we would be fools not to consider that when we sit down at our keyboards.  These are the stories that have stood the test of time by tapping into deep wells in the human psyche.

In composing this blog, I started thinking about the word “myth” and its multiple connotations.  The meaning I’ve referred to up to now evokes grandiose images and archetypal tales.  But the word “myth” has another connotation, one that means simply “false”.  I said that we would be fools not to consider the power of myths in our writing.  But we would also be remiss in not considering this second meaning of myth.  Because the world isn’t as simple as we wish.  Quite often a mental short-cut isn’t enough, either in writing or in life.  And that realization can carry a power every bit as profound–if not nearly as simple–as that evoked by the myths we love.

*            *            *

Rocket scientist by day, science fiction and fantasy author by night, Gregory D. Little’s short story “The Skylings” will be published in Azure Keep Quarterly in June.  His short fiction has additionally earned a Semi-Finalist and an Honorable Mention in the Writers of the Future short story contest.  He is currently hard at work on his third novel, a YA fantasy.  He lives in Fredericksburg, VA with his wife and their yellow lab.